Hey Scott! Thanks for stopping by. (Scott is one of the coolest guys from Seymour Duncan, and he's also a Fender veteran. He knows his stuff!)
Great question — and I'm probably a pretty good representative of the stack-averse player, so let's fight to the death discuss! 🙂
Yeah, no question, Paul + 50w is an amazing adrenaline rush — and a really great sound! But for me, some of the decisions about whether to use a large amp are similar to ones about when to use amp modeling: If you're gigging and/or recording, how it sounds to your ear in the moment is a lot less important than how it sounds to the microphone.
Sure, how your sound makes you feel in the moment is crucial, and we all crave tones that give us inspiration and confidence. But when you focus on what the tape/hard drive/audience hears rather than what you hear, the balance starts to tip in favor of smaller amps, IMHO. Well, IMHO doesn't matter — but Jimmy "No Marshalls in the Studio" Page's opinion does. 😉
In a sense, big-ass amps are an artifact of a time before adequate live sound reinforcement. In the ’60s, they WERE the PA! But with a halfway-decent modern PA, you can gig anywhere from the corner bar to Yankee Stadium with a 2-watt amp if you want.
So yeah — a Paul and a stack kick ass! But is said ass-kick worth the weight, the hyper-directional sound dispersion, and the potential ear damage? Your call! 🙂
|