Tonefiend Forum

Welcome Guest 

Show/Hide Header

Welcome Guest, posting in this forum requires registration.





Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Conversations
Double D

Posts: 195
Permalink
Post Conversations
on: August 30, 2012, 16:48
Quote

Whilst camping with a bunch of friends this weekend, (roasted a pig! Good fun!) I came up with what I think is a pretty apt description of being an accompanist.
Essentially you are in conversation when you're accompanying anyone and the same rules of engagement apply. When you're in respectful conversation with someone you don't generally blurt out random asides that have nothing to do with the conversation. You don't start speaking in extremes of loud or quiet; you modulate your tones with the flow of the chat and the relative background noise quite naturally. You wait for the person leading the talk to leave holes before you comment with more than a "yeah" or "mm-hmmm". You don't generally launch into another language, but you may use a particular bon-mot for effect. When there's a gap in the story/diatribe you take a moment to comment on the material, and perhaps share a personal anecdote that lends some other dimension to the chat. You pursue the topic to it's logical (and possibly illogical) conclusion.
Playing appropriately with almost any artist is exactly the same. Being a good listener is a boon in any part of your life, but an essential ingredient in an accompanist

Schrodinge-
rsgoldfish

Posts: 105
Permalink
Post Re: Conversations
on: August 30, 2012, 22:06
Quote

You sound like an old Jazzman!

Double D

Posts: 195
Permalink
Post Re: Conversations
on: August 31, 2012, 00:06
Quote

I wish I had the harmonic chops to really play jazz. I just kinda' play at jazz. 🙁 I'm looking older by the day, though...

Schrodinge-
rsgoldfish

Posts: 105
Permalink
Post Re: Conversations
on: August 31, 2012, 07:26
Quote

Quote from Double D on August 31, 2012, 00:06
I wish I had the harmonic chops to really play jazz. I just kinda' play at jazz. 🙁

Oh pish-posh. You're just too fixated on being able to play GOOD jazz.

But really, I love your original post. As scientific and mechanical as you can make music in your personal practice and structured environments, as soon as you add someone who doesn't know every song you play by the strict rules you play them by, it becomes all about this great give and take. Sadly I've seen people fail at this in both music and conversation. People talk at each other rather than to each other, and they fail to listen entirely. Enjoy the conversation!

Digital-
Larry

Posts: 192
Permalink
Post Re: Conversations
on: August 31, 2012, 13:47
Quote

My verbal conversation is filled with inside jokes that only I understand, free-association pop culture references, non-sequiturs and tangents about traveling to Japan. So what does that say about my playing? Hmmmm.

Double D

Posts: 195
Permalink
Post Re: Conversations
on: September 1, 2012, 02:19
Quote

Quote from Digital Larry on August 31, 2012, 13:47
My verbal conversation is filled with inside jokes that only I understand, free-association pop culture references, non-sequiturs and tangents about traveling to Japan. So what does that say about my playing? Hmmmm.

I think all of that (in musical terms) is fair game. When we quote a snatch of an old standard's melody over another tune, isn't that just what we're doing? When we evoke the tones of a classic recording and bend them to our will, isn't that what we're doing? My playing is full of such outside perspectives, but placed in context to broaden the "conversation". Joe's gleeful deconstructions are much the same idea as well, creating a running commentary with our collective memory.
One of the most successful examples I can think of is Jules Holland's brilliant co-opting of an old Big Three Trio piano solo for Squeeze's "Cool For Cats". Not too many new wavers would have ever heard the Big Three's tune that provided the magic in that song, but Jules was able to not only complement the tune beautifully, but pull Squeeze's pop music into some sort of historical/cultural context. Pretty good in-joke; it took me about fifteen years to get it, but when I got it, I got it!

dasein

Posts: 17
Permalink
Post Re: Conversations
on: September 2, 2012, 12:45
Quote

The conversation metaphor isn't a bad one, and on situations where you're unfamiliar with the other player's preferences, it's probably the safest route.

But really, I think the only way you can be sure is to ask the soloist. There's a couple important differences that separates verbal conversation from the soloist/accompanist relationship. Performing for an audience changes the equation pretty radically; in a normal conversation, the option is there to say, "Excuse me, but could you stop interrupting." Not to get too philosophical, but you can have a conversation ABOUT the conversation. In a musical performance, that kind of meta-conversation is virtually impossible. You can throw an accompanist dirty looks and try to give them all sorts of hints, but at the end of the day "the show must go on."

Some soloists actually like to be challenged and prodded by their accompanists. Some soloists get energized when they're thrown a curveball. And of course, plenty of soloists want you stay out of their way. The only way to know for sure is to talk with them... hopefully that opportunity for that particular conversation presents itself.

dasein

Posts: 17
Permalink
Post Re: Conversations
on: September 2, 2012, 12:50
Quote

Here's a good interview with drummer Billy Hart. He's worked with just about everyone, and he talks about the challenges of adapting his playing style to what people want:

https://dothemath.typepad.com/dtm/interview-with-billy-hart.html

Schrodinge-
rsgoldfish

Posts: 105
Permalink
Post Re: Conversations
on: September 2, 2012, 13:29
Quote

Quote from dasein on September 2, 2012, 12:45
But really, I think the only way you can be sure is to ask the soloist.

I'm confused. What exactly are we being sure about?

I think we should be careful about crossing our metaphors here. I think we can all agree that conversational band playing is certainly different from accompanying a soloist. Accompanying a soloist is really just helping facilitate a speech. If he's a real soloist, everyone came to here him. Playing in a band, and especially a band with improvisational elements, necessitates keeping good conversational give and take.

dasein

Posts: 17
Permalink
Post Re: Conversations
on: September 2, 2012, 19:28
Quote

Quote from Schrodingersgoldfish on September 2, 2012, 13:29

Quote from dasein on September 2, 2012, 12:45
But really, I think the only way you can be sure is to ask the soloist.

I'm confused. What exactly are we being sure about?

I think we should be careful about crossing our metaphors here. I think we can all agree that conversational band playing is certainly different from accompanying a soloist. Accompanying a soloist is really just helping facilitate a speech. If he's a real soloist, everyone came to here him. Playing in a band, and especially a band with improvisational elements, necessitates keeping good conversational give and take.

Being sure about how a soloist wants to be accompanied.

Yes, there is a conversational element to groups, especially those that value improvisation. But it isn't 100% pure conversation unless it's free improvisation. There are agreed-upon structures to the music, and one is that "if a player is taking a solo, the rhythm section of the band act as accompanists and will repress their ego and try to support the soloist as best as possible."

And the fact is, different soloists pretty different types of accompaniment. In that interview, Billy Hart talks about how Wes Montgomery preferred his drummers to be super straight-ahead. Most of the Tristano school players also preferred the rhythm section to stay out of the way of the soloists. A group like Miles Davis' second quintet, however, is pretty radically different. Listening to things like the Plugged Nickel recordings, it's clear that the rhythm section takes a much more interactive role, and will change the course of the tune how they see fit without any warning.

There's nothing wrong with any of these approaches, it's all a matter of preference. Personally, I like for a rhythm section to surprise me. But the only way to know for certain, again, is to talk to the other players in the band and have them tell you how they prefer to be accompanied.

This isn't just a courtesy, it's also a very smart way to ensure that you keep your gig.

Pages: [1] 2
Mingle Forum by cartpauj
Version: 1.0.34 ; Page loaded in: 0.118 seconds.

Comments are closed.