Tonefiend Forum

Welcome Guest 

Show/Hide Header

Welcome Guest, posting in this forum requires registration.
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Baseless Tone?
Jeff_H

Posts: 47
Permalink
Post Re: Baseless Tone?
on: August 20, 2012, 06:41
Quote

Oh man - I second Joe on "Arial Boundaries" - it is Dramatic!
Thecoslar

Posts: 45
Permalink
Post Re: Baseless Tone?
on: August 21, 2012, 13:42
Quote

Looks like our lines of reasoning are starting to intersect with

Tonefiend Forum

as far as splitting the signal.
Schrodinge-
rsgoldfish

Posts: 105
Permalink
Post Re: Baseless Tone?
on: August 26, 2012, 12:34
Quote

Splitting the signal like that is a great way to get good sonic variety. I will side with everyone else here, though. Everything needs to serve a purpose. If a piece doesn't need you to do too much in the lower registers, don't be afraid to leave them pretty sparse.
Thecoslar

Posts: 45
Permalink
Post Re: Baseless Tone?
on: August 29, 2012, 15:59
Quote

The solution I've come up with, that my band seems to like, is fairly simple. I run my guitar into a bass boost pedal- right now I'm using the EH mole- and I run that into my Red Witch Titan delay, which has three separate analog delays you can put in series or parallel. In the effects loop of the Titan, I run my Fulltone Catalyst (sort of a fuzz/boost with a two band tone control set up). I've got to tweak all the settings in between songs, but I've been able to get lots of interesting sounds that help fill the sonic space without over emphasizing the bottom end. I'll probably continue to switch it up over the course of the next few weeks, but this seems pretty workable.
joe
Administrator
Posts: 224
Permalink
Post Re: Baseless Tone?
on: August 30, 2012, 10:32
Quote

Quote from Jeff_H on August 20, 2012, 06:41
Oh man - I second Joe on "Arial Boundaries" - it is Dramatic!

Well, there are a lot of acoustic players these days with insane slapping/tapping/polyphonic technique. But unlike most of them, Michael was a composer.
Pages: 1 [2]
Mingle Forum by cartpauj
Version: 1.0.34 ; Page loaded in: 0.134 seconds.

Comments are closed.